Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G, having a overall score of 98.9 against 91.3. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is just a little thinner but just a bit heavier than the Galaxy A52 5G, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version, so it provides the user some additional features.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bit higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better video resolution, a lot bigger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos and a way more MP camera.
Galaxy A52 5G and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra both count with quite similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.