Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52s's 91.1 overall score. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A52s, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A52s has Android 11, offering some additional features.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a little bit better pixels amount in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Galaxy A52s both count with really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.