Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy A6, with a global score of 98.9 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is incredibly newer, but incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker than Galaxy A6. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, way more pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.