Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.07 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy A6, with a global score of 11.76 against 9.07. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is incredibly newer, but incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker than Galaxy A6. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, way more pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra both have very similar batteries, although the Samsung Galaxy A6 has just 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.