Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.05 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 11.76, which is way better than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 9.05 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is extremely newer than Galaxy A7 (2017), it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a brighter display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a better pixels density and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy A7 (2017) features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a 20 percent lower battery capacity.