Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70's, although it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a better pixel density and a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Galaxy A70 feature similar battery performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.