Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | -- |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A73 5G, getting a 98.9 score against 80.5. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Galaxy A73 5G has Android 12. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier device than Galaxy A73 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A73 5G, because it has a greater pixels density, a bit bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy A73 5G features just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A73 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A73 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy A73 5G. Both of them have a back-facing camera with a 108 megapixels and a F1.8 camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.