Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s overall score of 85.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a quite bigger display and a higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better video quality, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.