Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.29 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy C7, getting a 11.76 score against 9.29. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a lot newer phone than Galaxy C7, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 11 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Galaxy C7 have incredibly similar battery performance, although the Galaxy C7 has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy C7, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera and a lot higher video resolution.