Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, having a 98.9 score against 78.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bigger display and a greater amount of pixels per display inch. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.