Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy F23, getting a general score of 98.9 against 84.6. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Galaxy F23 has Android 12 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy F23, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a just a bit higher pixel density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy F23 has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.