Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Galaxy F41's 85.2 overall score. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Galaxy F41 were only released 2 months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is a little bit thinner but a little heavier than the Galaxy F41. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Galaxy F41 has Android 11 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and better performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better CPU than Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy F41, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a quite bigger screen and a bit greater pixel quantity per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy F41, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way larger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.