Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Galaxy F62, getting a score of 98.9 against 88.1. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner device than Galaxy F62, even though they were only released with a couple months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy F62 counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos, a lot higher video definition and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.