Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy Fold, with a general score of 98.9 against 97.6. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is newer and incredibly lighter, but also somewhat thicker than the Galaxy Fold. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Galaxy Fold has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a quite better 1440 x 3088 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Fold. They have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.