Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-06-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy J8, getting a score of 98.9 against 76.7. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body has the same thickness than Galaxy J8, but it's heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Galaxy J8 has Android 10 version, offering some additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite superior performance than Galaxy J8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better screen than Galaxy J8, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bigger display and a lot better pixels number per display inch.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy J8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J8, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features longer battery performance than Galaxy J8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.