Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, blue and white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | PLS |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M12's 80 overall score. Even when the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M12 were released with only 7 months difference, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version, providing a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a way higher screen pixels density, a little larger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy M12, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.