Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Galaxy M20, with a 98.9 score against 78.9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy M20.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little larger display and a little more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M20, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.