Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is better than Galaxy M21's global score of 84.1. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the Galaxy M21, and both of them were released with only 5 months difference. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy M21 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M21, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a quite bigger display and a quite higher screen density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M21, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M21, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a lot better video definition and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low-light environments.
Galaxy M21 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.