Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue, Brown and Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy M33, having a general score of 98.9 against 86.3. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy M33 has Android 12 version, giving you a couple nice extra features. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a bit heavier but somewhat thinner device than the Galaxy M33.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M33, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M33, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy M33, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy M33, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M33 features a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.