Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Galaxy M53 5G, getting a general score of 98.9 against 76.7. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12 version, so it counts with some additional features. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, we must note that it's also an older, a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little bit larger screen and a better screen density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M53 5G has a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture and a camera in the back with a 108 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.