Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 20's score of 90.8. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Galaxy Note 20 were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is just a little bit heavier but just a little thinner.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a quite larger display, more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processor than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same aperture and the same 24 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more than Galaxy Note 20, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.