Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a general score of 98.9 against 80.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is notably newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality, a camera with a much higher resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.