Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy S22, getting a general score of 98.9 against 93.4. Both of these devices include the same Android 13 operating system, so both of them should give the same operating system features. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S22.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite smaller screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same 24 frames per second video frame rate, the same 7680x4320 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S22, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S22. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy S22, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.