Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Galaxy S24 FE's general score of 76. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a bit lighter but just a bit thicker than the Galaxy S24 FE. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a quite smaller display and a little bit lower display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4 percent greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S24 FE, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.