Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.07 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 11.76, which is a lot better than the Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 9.07. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Galaxy S7 Active, but it is heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a little bit better display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number per inch of display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and 8 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has an 11 percent smaller battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.