Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 were released with only 7 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is thinner but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much greater screen density, a much bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.