Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 494 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a global score of 98.9 against 80.1. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even when Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only 5 months apart, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is notably thinner and lighter.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra count with very similar battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much better video quality and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more money than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.