Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.65 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a score of 11.76 against 9.65. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, even though both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Both devices in this review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should provide the same operating system features.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
