Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is better than Galaxy Z Flip's global score of 88.5. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better performance than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit bigger display and a little higher display density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a way higher video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.