Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a 98.9 score against 85.6. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is older, somewhat heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version, providing you some extra features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a just a bit higher pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more money than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.