Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 2's global score of 94.6. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy Z Fold 2 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is much lighter but thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 2, and both of them were released with only 1 months difference.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Fold 2's processor is just as good as the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra one, both have a 12 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery life is just as good as the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor and a camera with way more MP.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.