Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's 90.6 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, but it's much thicker and was released around 12 months before.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both have 12 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.