Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black Shadow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's 91.1 general score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a lot thicker but somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a much worse pixels amount per display inch and a bit worse 1968 x 2184px resolution, it also counts with a larger display. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a back camera with a lot worse 108 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.