Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's general score of 79. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a way newer and extremely thinner phone than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, although it is heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior processing unit than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a way worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, a way smaller display and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better low light captures and video and a much higher video quality. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.