Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.07 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 11.76, which is way better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 9.07 general score. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide identical operating system features. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and TCL 20 Pro 5G were released with only 8 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is thinner but just a little bit heavier than TCL 20 Pro 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a quite larger screen, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.