Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blasting black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, having a global score of 98.9 against 90.1. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is just a little bit lighter and a lot thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, even when both were only released with a few months difference. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides you some additional features.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3088px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a much higher video definition and a back facing camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.