Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T, getting a 98.9 score against 87.9. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features and improved performance. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi 10T, even when both were released only a couple of months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little bigger display and more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a way bigger camera sensor, a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.