Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, getting a general score of 98.9 against 90.7. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has Android 11 version. Even when the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra were only released 7 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is lighter and a bit thinner.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better count of pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1440 x 3200px resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same 24 fps video frame rates and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better resolution camera in the back, a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.