Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, with a 98.9 score against 81.4. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is newer than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's, although it is a bit thicker and incredibly heavier. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra both have incredibly similar displays, although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little bit smaller screen, a little lower screen density and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better video resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.