Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Ceramic |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, with a 98.9 score against 79.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is lighter but just a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, and they were only released 8 months apart. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a display that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra one, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a just a little worse pixels amount per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1860 x 2480 pixels and a bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold. Both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a same resolution back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.