Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 84.3. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it is extremely thicker and was released 4 years before.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher 2224 x 2488 resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 12 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.