Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, with a 98.9 score against 83.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has Android 11, so it provides you some nice extra features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, although both were only released 7 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better camera than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a slightly better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.