Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, getting a 98.9 score against 75.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, we must highlight that it is also a incredibly older, somewhat heavier and a bit thicker device. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12, giving some extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro count with similar displays, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a little bit smaller display, a bit worse amount of pixels per display inch and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a back facing camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.