Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, getting a 98.9 score against 83. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is just a little heavier but also thinner.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution back camera, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.