Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a 98.9 score against 80.2. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, providing a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer cellphone than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. Both have a 12 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a quite greater display pixels density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a much higher resolution back camera. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.