Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than ZTE Axon 11, with a global score of 98.9 against 76. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while ZTE Axon 11 has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier and a bit thicker device than the ZTE Axon 11.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher screen pixels density. ZTE Axon 11 has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and a much better video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little longer battery life than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.