Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the ZTE Axon 20's general score of 77.8. Despite being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the ZTE Axon 20. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a greater display density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better camera than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a way higher video quality, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments, a much larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 20, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.