Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's global score of 78.1. Although it's the best device in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11, offering some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit bigger display and more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater memory to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.