Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Google Nexus 6's overall score of 81.1. Galaxy Note 20 is a notably newer and thinner cellphone than Google Nexus 6, but it is a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more cores and 5 GB more RAM.
Google Nexus 6 has a more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a just a bit higher pixel count per screen inch. Galaxy Note 20 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot better video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 34% greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is also the cheapest, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.