Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than Google Pixel, having a 90.8 score against 80.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is notably heavier than Google Pixel, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Google Pixel features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. Google Pixel's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Galaxy Note 20's one, both have equal internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations and a way higher video definition.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.