Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 general score. Galaxy Note 20's construction is newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 3 XL. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos and a way higher video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.